Super-Regenerative Detection 241
Figure 1 0.8: Schematic of CMOS 96 GHz SRX with DTL-CSRR.
SRRs are closely coupled to the same host T-line implemented in the to pmost
metal layer (M8). The overall size of the proposed DTL-SRR is 35 × 34 µm
2
.
For the purpose of comparison, a traditional LC-tank resonator is designed in
the M8 metal layer as shown in Figure 10 .9(b), which has the same resonance
frequency of 135GHz. The S-parameters of both structur es are also verified by
EMX with the same parasitic capacitance of 16fF. As shown in Figur e 10 .10, a t
the vicinity of 140-GHz resonanc e, ε > 0 and µ < 0, and a magnetic plasmonic
medium is formed. As a re sult, a stop-band is formed at 140 GHz within a
narrow bandwidth of 3.5 GHz. The Q factor of the DTL-SRR resonator is 40,
which is more than 2 times the Q of the LC-tank re sonator. Moreover, the
DTL-SRR resonator layout area (1190 µm
2
) is less than half of the LC-tank
resonator (2500 µm
2
).
Such a Q factor enhancement effect can also be explained by the strong
phase non-linearity in the freq ue nc y range closed to SRRs resonance. Note
that the Q factor c an also be obtained by phase-based method:
Q =
ω
0
2
· |
d∠Z(jω)
dω
|, (10.15)
where ∠Z(jω) is the phase of resonator impedance. Figure 10.11(a) shows
the impedance dia gram of both DTL-SRR and LC-Tank witho ut any capac-
itor loading. A resonance generated by the SRR loadings is observed at 167
GHz for DTL-SRR. Such res onance causes non-linear phase shift at 140 GHz.
Figure 10.11(b) shows that DTL-SRR has much s tronger pha se non-linearity
than that of LC-Tank around 140 GHz. As shown in Figure 10.11(c), both