Communication

Communication is the process of sharing information with other individuals. Information, as understood here, is any thought or idea that managers want to share with others. In general, communication involves the process of one person projecting a message to one or more other people, which results in everyone arriving at a common understanding of the message. Because communication is a commonly used management skill and ability and is often cited as the skill most responsible for a manager’s success, prospective managers must learn how to communicate.13 To help managers become better interpersonal communicators, new training techniques are constantly being developed and evaluated.14

The communication activities of managers generally involve interpersonal communication—sharing information with other organization members.15 The following sections feature both the general topic of interpersonal communication and the more specific topic of interpersonal communication in organizations.

Interpersonal Communication

To be a successful interpersonal communicator, a manager must understand the following:

  1. How interpersonal communication works

  2. The relationship between feedback and interpersonal communication

  3. The importance of verbal versus nonverbal interpersonal communication

How Interpersonal Communication Works

Interpersonal communication is the process of transmitting information to others.16 To be complete, the process must have the following three basic elements:17

  1. The source/encoder—The source/encoder is the person in the interpersonal communication situation who originates and encodes information to be shared with others. Encoding is putting information into a form that can be received and understood by another individual. Putting one’s thoughts into a letter is an example of encoding. Until information is encoded, it cannot be shared with others. (From here on, the source/encoder will be referred to simply as the source.)

  2. The signal—Encoded information that the source intends to share constitutes a message. A message that has been transmitted from one person to another is called a signal.

  3. The decoder/destination—The decoder/destination is the person or persons with whom the source is attempting to share information. This person receives the signal and decodes, or interprets, the message to determine its meaning. Decoding is the process of converting messages back into information. In all interpersonal communication situations, message meaning is the result of decoding. (From here on, the decoder/destination will be referred to simply as the destination.)

The classic work of Wilbur Schramm clarifies the role played by each of the three elements of the interpersonal communication process. As implied in Figure 12.4, the source determines what information to share, encodes that information in the form of a message, and then transmits the message as a signal to the destination. The destination decodes the transmitted message to determine its meaning and then responds accordingly.

Figure 12.4 Roles of the source, signal, and destination in the communication process

A manager who desires to assign the performance of a certain task to a subordinate would use the communication process in the following way: First, the manager would determine exactly what task he or she wants the subordinate to perform. Then the manager would encode and transmit to the subordinate a message that would accurately reflect this assignment. The message transmission itself could be as simple as the manager telling the subordinate what the new responsibilities include. Next, the subordinate would decode the message transmitted by the manager to ascertain its meaning and then respond to it appropriately.

Successful and Unsuccessful Interpersonal Communication

 Successful communication refers to an interpersonal communication situation in which the information the source intends to share with the destination and the meaning the destination derives from the transmitted message are the same. Conversely, unsuccessful communication is an interpersonal communication situation in which the information the source intends to share with the destination and the meaning the destination derives from the transmitted message are different.

To increase the probability that communication will be successful, the message must be encoded so that the source’s experience of the way a signal should be decoded is equivalent to the destination’s experience of the way it should be decoded. If these experiences match up, the probability is high that the destination will interpret the signal as intended by the source. Figure 12.5 illustrates these overlapping fields of experience that ensure successful communication.

Figure 12.5 Overlapping fields of experience that ensure successful communication

Barriers to Successful Interpersonal Communication

Factors that decrease the probability that communication will be successful are called communication barriers. A clear understanding of these barriers will help managers maximize their communication success. The following sections discuss both communication macrobarriers and communication microbarriers.

Macrobarriers

Communication macrobarriers are factors that hinder successful communication in a general communication situation.18 These factors relate primarily to the communication environment and to the larger world in which communication takes place. Some common macrobarriers include the following:19

  1. The increasing need for information—Because society is changing constantly and rapidly, individuals have an increasingly greater need for information. This growing need tends to overload communication networks, thereby distorting communication. To minimize the effects of this barrier, managers should take steps to ensure that organization members are not overloaded with information. Only information critical to the performance of their jobs should be transmitted to them.

    The White House is an example of an organization that regularly faces an increasing need for information from a variety of audiences, including the American public. After an evaluation of President Barack Obama’s first year in office, the White House staff decided to retool elements of its communication strategy to better meet increasing needs for information that others might have. As a result of this evaluation, the White House staff decided to take specific steps to better meet such increasing needs—for example, staffers should be more aggressive in taking initiative in sending out information before it’s requested. In addition, they should provide speedier, more exact responses to information requests and help the president be more efficient when communicating with others.20

  2. The need for increasingly complex information—Because of today’s rapid technological advances, most people are confronted with complex communication situations in their everyday lives. However, if managers take steps to emphasize simplicity in communication, the effects of this barrier can be lessened. Furnishing organization members with adequate training to deal with more technical areas is another strategy for overcoming this barrier.

  3. The reality that people in the United States are increasingly coming into contact with people who use languages other than English—As U.S. business becomes more international in scope and as organization members travel more frequently, the need to know languages other than English increases. The potential communication barrier of this multilanguage situation is obvious. Moreover, people who deal with foreigners need to be familiar with not only their languages but also their cultures. Formal knowledge of a foreign language is of little value unless the individual also knows which words, phrases, and actions are culturally acceptable.22

  4. The constant need to learn new concepts cutting down on the time available for communication—Many managers feel pressured to learn new and important concepts that they did not need to know in the past. Learning about the intricacies of international business or computer usage, for example, takes up significant amounts of managerial time. Many managers also find that the increased demands that training employees makes on their time leaves them with little time to communicate with other organization members.

Microbarriers

A communication microbarrier is a factor that hinders successful communication in a specific communication situation.23 This factor relates directly to such variables as the communication message, the source, and the destination. Among the microbarriers are the following:24

  1. Source’s view of the destination—The source in any communication situation has a tendency to view the destination in a specific way, and this view influences the messages sent. For example, individuals usually speak one way to people they think are informed about a subject and another way to those they believe are uninformed. The destination can sense the source’s attitudes, which often blocks successful communication. Managers should thus keep an open mind about the people with whom they communicate and be careful not to imply negative attitudes through their communication behaviors. Figure 12.6 lists several examples of negative attitudes or stereotypes that managers in our society might possess regarding various types of employees. If managers possess such negative feelings about employees, those feelings will inevitably negatively impact the manner of managers’ communications with those employees and ultimately limit organizational success. Such negative attitudes or stereotypes have no place in the world of modern management.

  2. Message interference—Stimuli that compete with the communication message for the attention of the destination are called message interference , or noise. An example of message interference is a manager talking to a worker while the worker is trying to input data into a computer. The inputting of data is the message interference because it is competing with the manager’s communication message. Managers should attempt to communicate only when they have the total attention of the individuals with whom they wish to share information.

    Figure 12.6 Examples of managers’ potentially negative attitudes toward employees25

  3. Destination’s view of the source—Certain attitudes of the destination toward the source can also hinder successful communication. If, for example, a destination believes that the source has little credibility in the area about which the source is communicating, the destination may filter out much of the source’s message and pay only slight attention to that part of the message actually received. Managers should attempt to consider the worth of messages transmitted to them independently of their personal attitudes toward the source. Many valuable ideas will escape them if they allow their personal feelings toward others to influence which messages they attend to.

  4. PerceptionPerception is an individual’s interpretation of a message. Different individuals may perceive the same message in different ways. The two primary factors that influence how a message is perceived are the destination’s education level and the destination’s amount of experience. To minimize the negative effects of this perceptual factor on interpersonal communication, managers should try to send messages with precise meanings. Ambiguous words generally tend to magnify negative perceptions. What’s more, trite or insincere messages are easy for employees to detect.26

  5. Multimeaning words—Because many words in the English language have several meanings, a destination may have difficulty deciding which meaning should be attached to the words of a message. A manager should not assume that a word means the same thing to all the people who use it.

A classic study by Lydia Strong substantiates this point. Strong concluded that for the 500 most common words in the English language, there are 4,070 different dictionary definitions. On average, each of these words has more than eight usages. The word run is an example:27

  • Babe Ruth scored a run.

  • Did you ever see Jesse Owens run?

  • I have a run in my stocking.

  • There is a fine run of salmon this year.

  • Are you going to run this company or am I?

  • You have the run of the place.

  • What headline do you want to run?

  • There was a run on the bank today.

  • Did he run the ship aground?

  • I have to run [drive the car] downtown.

  • Who will run for president this year?

  • Joe flies the New York–Chicago run twice a week.

  • You know the kind of people they run around with.

  • The apples run large this year.

  • Please run my bathwater.

When encoding information, managers should be careful to define whenever possible the terms they are using, never use obscure meanings for words when designing messages, and strive to use words in the same way their destination uses them.

Feedback and Interpersonal Communication

Feedback is the destination’s reaction to a message. Feedback can be used by the source to ensure successful communication. For example, if the destination’s message reaction is inappropriate, the source can conclude that communication was unsuccessful and that another message should be transmitted. If the destination’s message reaction is appropriate, the source can conclude that communication was successful (assuming, of course, that the appropriate reaction did not happen merely by chance). Because of its potentially high value, managers should encourage feedback whenever possible and evaluate it carefully.28

Gathering and Using Feedback

Feedback can be either verbal or nonverbal.29 To gather verbal feedback, the source can simply ask the destination pertinent message-related questions; the destination’s answers should indicate whether the message was perceived as intended. To gather nonverbal feedback, the source can observe the destination’s nonverbal response to a message.30 Say a manager has transmitted a message to a subordinate, specifying new steps that must be taken in the normal performance of the subordinate’s job. The subordinate’s failure to follow the steps accurately constitutes nonverbal feedback telling the manager that the initial message needs to be clarified.

White House staffers are now more proactive and exact when dispensing information, which helps the president communicate more efficiently.

Image Source/Getty

If managers discover that their communication effectiveness is relatively low over an extended period of time, they should assess the situation to determine how to improve their communication skills. It may be that their vocabulary is confusing to their destinations. For example, a study conducted by Group Attitudes Corporation found that when managers used certain words repeatedly in communicating with steelworkers, the steelworkers usually became confused.31 Among the words causing confusion were accrue, contemplate, designate, detriment, magnitude, and subsequently.

Achieving Communication Effectiveness

In general, managers can sharpen their communication skills by adhering to the following “10 commandments of good communication” as closely as possible:32

  1. Seek to clarify your ideas before communicating—The more systematically you analyze the problem or idea to be communicated, the clearer it becomes. This is the first step toward effective communication. Many communications fail because of inadequate planning. Good planning must consider the goals and attitudes of those who will receive the communication and those who will be affected by it.

  2. Examine the true purpose of each communication—Before you communicate, ask yourself what you really want to accomplish with your message—obtain information, initiate action, change another person’s attitude? Identify your most important goal and then adapt your language, tone, and total approach to serve that specific objective. Don’t try to accomplish too much with each communication. The sharper the focus of your message, the greater its chances of success.

  3. Consider the total physical and human setting whenever you communicate—Meaning and intent are conveyed by more than words alone. Many other factors influence the overall impact of a communication, and managers must be sensitive to the total setting in which they communicate. Consider, for example, your sense of timing, or the circumstances under which you make an announcement or render a decision; the physical setting; whether you communicate in private or otherwise, for example, the social climate that pervades work relationships within your company or department and sets the tone of its communications; and custom and practice, or the degree to which your communication conforms to, or departs from, the expectations of your audience. Be constantly aware of the total setting in which you communicate. Like all living things, communication must be capable of adapting to its environment.

  4. Consult with others, when appropriate, in planning communications—Frequently, it is desirable or necessary to seek the participation of others in planning a communication or in developing the facts on which to base the communication. Such consultation often lends additional insight and objectivity to your message. Moreover, those who have helped you plan your communication will give it their active support.

  5. Be mindful of the overtones while you communicate rather than merely the basic content of your message—Your tone of voice, your expression, and your apparent receptiveness to the responses of others have a significant effect on those you wish to reach. Frequently overlooked, these subtleties of communication often affect a listener’s reaction to a message even more than its basic content. Similarly, your choice of language—particularly your awareness of the fine shades of meaning and emotion in the words you use—predetermines, in large part, the reactions of your listeners.

  6. Take the opportunity, when it arises, to convey something of help or value to the receiver—Consideration of the other person’s interests and needs—trying to look at things from the other person’s point of view—frequently points out opportunities to convey something of immediate benefit or long-range value to the other person. Subordinates are most responsive to managers whose messages take the subordinates’ interests into account.

  7. Follow up your communication—Your best efforts at communication may be wasted, and you may never know whether you have succeeded in expressing your true meaning and intent, if you do not follow up and evaluate how well your message was received. You can do this by asking questions, by encouraging the receiver to express his or her reactions, by following up on contacts, and by subsequently reviewing performance. Make certain that you get feedback for every important communication so that complete understanding and appropriate action result.

  8. Communicate for tomorrow as well as today—Even though communications may be aimed primarily at meeting the demands of an immediate situation, they must be planned with the past in mind if they are to be viewed as consistent by the receiver. Most importantly, however, communications must be consistent with long-range interests and goals. For example, it is not easy to communicate frankly on such matters as poor performance or the shortcomings of a loyal subordinate, but postponing disagreeable communications makes these matters more difficult in the long run and is actually unfair to your subordinates and your company.

  9. Be sure your actions support your communications—In the final analysis, the most persuasive kind of communication is not what you say, but what you do. When your actions or attitudes contradict your words, others tend to discount what you have said. For every manager, good supervisory practices—such as clear assignment of responsibility and authority, fair rewards for effort, and sound policy enforcement—communicate more than all the gifts of oratory.

  10. Last, but by no means least, seek not only to be understood, but also to understand—be a good listener—When you start talking, you often cease to listen, or at least to be attuned to the other person’s unspoken reactions and attitudes. Even more serious is the occasional inattentiveness you may be guilty of when others are attempting to communicate with you. Listening is one of the most important, most difficult, and most neglected skills in communication. It demands that you concentrat0e not only on the explicit meanings another person is expressing but also on the implicit meanings, unspoken words, and undertones that may be far more significant.

Verbal and Nonverbal Interpersonal Communication

Interpersonal communication is generally divided into two types: verbal and nonverbal. Up to this point, this chapter has emphasized verbal communication—communication that uses either spoken or written words to share information with others.

Nonverbal communication is sharing information without using words to encode thoughts. Factors commonly used to encode thoughts in nonverbal communication are gestures, vocal tones, and facial expressions.33 However, in most interpersonal communication, verbal and nonverbal communications are not mutually exclusive. Instead, the destination’s interpretation of a message is generally based both on the words contained in the message and on such nonverbal factors as the source’s gestures and facial expressions.

The Importance of Nonverbal Communication

In an interpersonal communication situation in which both verbal and nonverbal factors are present, nonverbal factors may have more influence on the total effect of the message.35 Over two decades ago, Albert Mehrabian developed the following formula to indicate the relative contributions of verbal and nonverbal factors to the total effect of a message: total message impact = 0.07 words + 0.38 vocal tones + 0.55 facial expressions. Other nonverbal factors besides vocal tones that can influence the effect of a verbal message are facial expressions, gestures, gender, and dress. Managers who are aware of this great potential influence of nonverbal factors on the effect of their communications will use nonverbal message components to complement their verbal message components whenever possible.36

Nonverbal messages can also be used to add meaning to verbal messages. For instance, a head might be nodded or a voice toned to show either agreement or disagreement.

Managers must be especially careful when they are communicating that verbal and nonverbal factors do not present contradictory messages. For example, if the words of a message express approval while the nonverbal factors express disapproval, the result will be message ambiguity that leaves the destination frustrated.

Managers who are able to communicate successfully through a blend of verbal and nonverbal communication are critical to the success of virtually every organization. In fact, the Darden Graduate School of Business at the University of Virginia commissioned a recent survey of corporate recruiters across the United States, and the survey revealed that the skill organizations most seek in prospective employees is facility at verbal and nonverbal communication.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.217.211.92