Strategy Formulation: Tools

After managers involved in the strategic management process have analyzed the environment and determined the proper organizational direction through the development of a mission statement and organizational objectives, they are ready to formulate strategy. Strategy formulation is the process of determining appropriate courses of action for achieving organizational objectives and thereby accomplishing the organizational purpose.

Managers formulate strategies that reflect environmental analysis, lead to fulfillment of the organizational mission, and result in the attainment of organizational objectives. Special tools they can use to assist them in formulating strategies include the following:

  • Critical question analysis

  • SWOT analysis

  • Business portfolio analysis

These three strategy development tools are related but distinct. Managers should use the tool or combination of tools that seems most appropriate for them and their organizations.

Critical Question Analysis

A synthesis of the ideas of several contemporary management writers suggests that formulating an appropriate organizational strategy is a process of critical question analysis:21

  • What are the purposes and objectives of the organization? The answer to this question will tell management where the organization should be going. As indicated earlier, an appropriate strategy reflects both organizational purpose and organizational objectives. By answering this question during the strategy formulation process, managers are likely to remember this important point and thereby minimize inconsistencies among the organization’s purposes, objectives, and strategies.

  • Where is the organization presently going? The answer to this question can tell managers whether the organization is achieving its goals and, if it is, whether the level of progress is satisfactory. Whereas the first question focuses on where the organization should be going, this one focuses on where the organization is actually going.

  • In what kind of environment does the organization now exist? Both internal and external environments—factors inside and outside the organization—are included in this question. For example, assume that a poorly trained middle-management team and a sudden influx of competitors in a market are respective factors in the internal and external environments of an organization. Any strategy formulated, if it is to be appropriate, must deal with these factors.

  • What can be done to better achieve organizational objectives in the future? The answer to this question will result in the strategy of the organization. The question should be answered, however, only after managers have had an adequate opportunity to reflect on the answers to the previous three questions. Managers cannot develop an appropriate organizational strategy unless they have a clear understanding of where the organization wants to go, where it is going, and in what environment it exists. This understanding is typically achieved through discussion, negotiation, and compromise.23

SWOT Analysis

SWOT analysis is a strategic development tool that matches internal organizational strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats. (SWOT is an acronym for a firm’s Strengths and Weaknesses and its environmental Opportunities and Threats.) It is important to note that when using SWOT analysis, “strengths” and “weaknesses” are those of the manager’s firm, and “opportunities” and “threats” exist in the firm’s external environment. SWOT analysis is based on the assumption that if managers carefully review such strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, a useful strategy for ensuring organizational success will become evident to them.24

Business Portfolio Analysis

Business portfolio analysis is another strategy development tool that has gained wide acceptance. Business portfolio analysis is an organizational strategy formulation technique that is based on the philosophy that organizations should develop strategy much as they handle investment portfolios. That is, just as sound financial investments should be supported and unsound ones discarded, sound organizational activities should be emphasized and unsound ones deemphasized. Two business portfolio tools are the BCG Growth-Share Matrix and the GE Multifactor Portfolio Matrix.

The Bcg Growth-Share Matrix

The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), a leading manufacturing consulting firm, developed and popularized a portfolio analysis tool that helps managers develop organizational strategies based on market share of businesses and the growth of markets in which businesses exist.

The first step in using the BCG Growth-Share Matrix is identifying the organization’s strategic business units (SBUs). A strategic business unit is a significant organizational segment that is analyzed to develop organizational strategy aimed at generating future business or revenue. Exactly what constitutes an SBU varies from organization to organization. In larger organizations, an SBU could be a company division, a single product, or a complete product line. In smaller organizations, it might be the entire company. Although SBUs vary drastically in form, each has the following four characteristics:25

  1. It is a single business or collection of related businesses.

  2. It has its own competitors.

  3. It has a manager who is accountable for its operation.

  4. It is an area that can be independently planned for within the organization.

After SBUs have been identified for a particular organization, the next step in using the BCG Matrix is to categorize each SBU within one of the following four matrix quadrants (see Figure 7.4):

Figure 7.4 The BCG Growth-Share Matrix

  • Star—An SBU that is a star has a large share of a high-growth market and typically needs large amounts of cash to support rapid and significant growth. Stars also generate large amounts of cash for the organization and are usually segments in which management can make additional investments and earn attractive returns.

  • Cash Cow—An SBU that is a cash cow has a large share of a market that is growing only slightly. Naturally, these SBUs provide the organization with large amounts of cash, but because the market is not growing significantly, the cash is generally used to meet the financial demands of the organization in other areas, such as the expansion of a star SBU.

  • Question Mark—An SBU that is a question mark has a small share of a high-growth market. Such SBUs are dubbed “question marks” because it is uncertain whether management should invest more cash in them to gain a larger share of the market or deemphasize or eliminate them. Management will choose the first option when it believes it can turn the question mark into a star and will choose the second when it thinks further investment would be fruitless.

  • Dog—An SBU that is a dog has a relatively small share of a low-growth market. Such SBUs may barely support themselves; in some cases, they actually drain off cash resources generated by other SBUs. Examples of dogs are SBUs that produce typewriters or cash registers.

Companies such as Westinghouse and Shell Oil have successfully used the BCG Matrix in their strategic management processes. This technique, however, has some potential pitfalls. For one thing, the matrix does not consider such factors as (1) various types of risk associated with product development; (2) threats that inflation and other economic conditions can create in the future; and (3) social, political, and ecological pressures. These pitfalls may be the reason for recent research results indicating that the BCG Matrix does not always help managers make good strategic decisions.26 Managers must therefore remember to weigh such factors carefully when designing an organizational strategy based on the BCG Matrix.

The Ge Multifactor Portfolio Matrix

With the help of McKinsey and Company, a leading consulting firm, the General Electric Company (GE) developed another popular portfolio analysis tool. Called the GE Multifactor Portfolio Matrix, this tool helps managers develop organizational strategy that is based primarily on market attractiveness and business strengths. The GE Multifactor Portfolio Matrix was intentionally designed to be more comprehensive than the BCG Growth-Share Matrix.

Its basic use is illustrated in Figure 7.5. Each of the organization’s businesses or SBUs is plotted on a matrix in two dimensions: industry attractiveness and business strength. Each of these two dimensions is actually a composite of a variety of factors that each firm must determine for itself, given its own unique situation. As examples, industry attractiveness might be determined by such factors as the number of competitors in an industry, the rate of industry growth, and the weakness of competitors within an industry; business strength might be determined by such factors as a company’s financially solid position, its good bargaining position over suppliers, and its high level of technology use.

Figure 7.5 GE’s Multifactor Portfolio Matrix

Several circles appear in Figure 7.5, each representing a company line of business or SBU. Circle size indicates the relative market size for that line of business. The shaded portion of a circle represents the proportion of the total SBU market that a company has captured.

Specific strategies of a company are implied by where its businesses (represented by circles) fall on the matrix. Businesses falling in the cells that form a diagonal from lower left to upper right are medium-strength businesses, which should be invested in only selectively. Businesses above and to the left of this diagonal are the strongest and the ones that a company should invest in and help to grow. Businesses in the cells below and to the right of the diagonal are low in overall strength and are serious candidates for divestiture.

Portfolio models are graphic frameworks for analyzing relationships among the businesses of an organization, and they can provide useful strategy recommendations. However, no model yet devised gives managers a universally accepted approach for dealing with these issues. Portfolio models, then, should never be applied in a mechanistic fashion, and any conclusions they suggest must be carefully considered in light of sound managerial judgment and experience.

Strategy Formulation: Types

Understanding the forces that determine competitiveness within an industry should help managers develop strategies that will make their companies more competitive within the industry. Porter has developed three generic strategies to illustrate the kinds of strategies managers might develop to make their organizations more competitive.27

Differentiation

Differentiation, the first of Porter’s strategies, focuses on making an organization more competitive by its developing a product or products that customers perceive as being different from products offered by competitors. Differentiation includes uniqueness in such areas as product quality, design, and level of after-sales service. Examples of products that customers commonly purchase because they perceive them as being different are Nike’s Air Jordan shoes (because of their high-technology “air” construction) and Honda automobiles (because of their high reliability).

Cost Leadership

Cost leadership is a strategy that focuses on making an organization more competitive by its producing products more cheaply than competitors can. According to the logic behind this strategy, by producing products more cheaply than its competitors, an organization will then be able to offer products to customers at lower prices than competitors can and will thereby increase its market share. Examples of tactics managers might use to gain cost leadership are obtaining lower prices on product parts purchased from suppliers and using technology such as robots to increase organizational productivity.

Dollar Tree’s strategy focuses on selling name-brand and off-brand products at lower prices than its competitors.

Ian Dagnall/Alamy

Focus

Focus is a strategy that emphasizes making an organization more competitive by targeting a particular customer. Magazine publishers commonly use a focus strategy in offering their products to specific customers. Working Woman and Ebony are examples of magazines that are aimed, respectively, at the target markets of employed women and African Americans.

Sample Organizational Strategies

Analyzing the organizational environment and applying one or more of the strategy tools—critical question analysis, SWOT analysis, business portfolio analysis, and Porter’s Model—will give managers a foundation on which to formulate an organizational strategy. The four common organizational strategies that evolve this way are growth, stability, retrenchment, and divestiture. The following discussion of these organizational strategies features business portfolio analysis as the tool used to arrive at the strategy, although the same strategies could result from critical question analysis, SWOT analysis, and Porter’s Model.

Growth

Growth is a strategy adopted by management to increase the amount of business that an SBU is currently generating. The growth strategy is generally applied to star SBUs or to question mark SBUs that have the potential to become stars. Management generally invests substantial amounts of money to implement this strategy and may even sacrifice short-term profit to build long-term gain.28

Managers can also pursue a growth strategy by purchasing an SBU from another organization. Black & Decker held the leadership position in power tools for many years, but the company wanted to extend its reach beyond that product line. Rather than attempt to develop its own line of power tools, Black & Decker purchased General Electric’s small-appliance business. Through this purchase, Black & Decker hoped that the amount of business it did would grow significantly over the long term. Similarly, President Enterprises, the largest food company in Taiwan, bought the American Famous Amos brand of chocolate chip cookies. Despite a downturn in the U.S. cookie market, management at President saw the purchase as important for company growth because it would give the company a nationally recognized product line in the United States.29

Stability

Stability is a strategy adopted by management to maintain or slightly improve the amount of business that an SBU is generating. This strategy is generally applied to cash cows because these SBUs are already in an advantageous position. Management must be careful, however, that in its pursuit of stability, it does not turn cash cows into dogs.

Retrenchment

In this strategy, retrench is used in the military sense: to defend or fortify. Through retrenchment strategy, management attempts to strengthen or protect the amount of business an SBU is currently generating. This strategy is generally applied to cash cows or stars that are beginning to lose market share.

Divestiture

Divestiture is a strategy adopted to eliminate an SBU that is not generating a satisfactory amount of business and that has little hope of doing so in the near future. In essence, the organization sells or closes down the SBU in question. This strategy is usually applied to SBUs that are dogs or question marks that have failed to increase market share but still require significant amounts of cash.

MyManagementLab : Try It, Strategic Management

If your instructor has assigned this activity, go to mymanagementlab.com to try a simulation exercise about a coffee business.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.119.142.232